by Ben Shapiro
On Wednesday, on the first anniversary of President Barack Obama’s speech to the United Nations in which he called for ouster of Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, Obama attempted to rally support for his airstrikes against Assad’s terrorist opposition. Taking on issues ranging from Iran to Russia, from Ukraine to Syria, from global warming to Ebola, Obama pledged to utilize American might in service to the United Nations, speaking grandly of the beauty and power of the world’s least effective and most morally bankrupt international institution.
Obama opened with a Dickensian world of Manichean opposites:
Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentlemen: we come together at a crossroads between war and peace; between disorder and integration; between fear and hope. Read more at breitbart.com.
And just when you thought the UN was loosing some of it’s bite-
Secretary of State John Kerry has called climate change “the biggest challenge of all that we face right now,” and his French counterpart has warned of climate “chaos” in 500 days, and now the U.N. climate change chief is implying that climate change can be viewed on a par with the deadly Ebola outbreak.
Click for full article from cnsnews.com-
I know there are many disturbing events taking place right now that are dominating the news cycle: Our total failures in Iraq and the rise of ISIL, the ridiculous border crisis and amnesty, our absentee Golfer in Chief to name just a few, but there are so many things going on that don’t get covered. As the grandfather of a teenager with special needs, this article really struck home:
From fixthisnation.com: It’s impossible to say when the pro-environment movement crossed from the responsible into the ridiculous, but it can be said for certain that they have been there for some time. The latest example of the government overstepping their bounds has a public school in Jurupa Valley, California telling students with special needs to dig through the garbage to find recyclables.
Carmen Wells, the parent of one of the students, raised the biggest furor when her son came home ashamed after the first day of school at Patriot Valley High..
“It bothered my son, but he wants to be part of everyone, part of the team, so he’s going to do it,” Wells said. “I felt victimized for my child and his classmates.”
District officials confirm students with special needs were instructed to sift through trash cans for recyclables and that they’ve been having students with special needs do this for years. They said the money raised from the recycled items funds a larger training plan that teaches students with special needs about managing money, among other life skills.
The school district suspended the program once the outrage started pouring in, telling the media that they would consider getting some different bins for the recycling. What a concept. It’s also a pretty sad statement if the school thinks the “life skills” these students need involve sifting through garbage to find plastic bottles.
Forcing special needs children to dig through the trash for recyclable materials may be a new low as far as government programs go, but it is not the first time recycling has hurt people, hurt businesses, and even hurt the environment.
- A late 90s scientific study showed that hundreds of Taiwanese buildings had been built from contaminated recycled steel, contaminating thousands of people with high levels of gamma radiation.
- It came to light in 2007 that a Seattle recycling factory was among the biggest sources of airborne pollution in the entire Northwest.
- Finally, it’s a little known fact that most kinds of common plastic cannot even be recycled. It all gets thrown into the bins (well, in those areas that bother to separate them beforehand), and then the non-recyclables get thrown into the landfill anyway. Environmentalists, therefore, call on people to sort through their recyclables again to make sure you’re only throwing the right kind of plastic into the blue bins.
In the face of all this, it would seem that the average person could be trusted to at least decide for themselves whether or not they want to recycle. There are arguments against the practice of non-aluminum recycling that cite higher costs and little environmental benefit, particularly when it comes to residential curbside recycling. For the most part, the federal government has kept its hands clean of legislation, but there are a few cities such as Seattle that levy fines against homeowners who don’t recycle.
I can’t wait to see what the Alachua County School Board has in store for my fifth grader grandson tomorrow. We will be prepared!
Renewamerica.com: Try to ignore Earth Day, April 22. It won’t be easy. The print and broadcast media will engage in an orgy of environmental tall tales and the usual end-of-the-world predictions. It will scare the heck out of youngsters and bore the heck out of anyone old enough to know that we have had to endure the lies that hide the agendas that have driven the Greens since 1970 when the event was first proclaimed.
The Earth is 4.5 billion years old. It is the third planet from the Sun and fifth-largest of the eight other planets that orbit it. It is the only planet in our galaxy that has life on it and it has an abundance of mineral resources as well as water and the fecundity to grow crops and maintain livestock to sustain the human race.
The climate on Earth is entirely dependent on the natural cycles of the Sun. Despite four decades of being told that the Earth was going to heat up due to greenhouse gas like carbon dioxide and methane, we are currently in a cooling cycle and no child born since 1997 has ever experienced a single day of the dreaded “global warming.” Read more at renewamerica.com
Related articles on the Climate Change
…In a corrupt scheme, Sue and Settle, fireplaces next. But a half-billion dollar biomass plant is OK.
As of January 3rd, the EPA banned about 80% of the wood-burning stoves and fireplace inserts in the United States. Stoves which are used to heat 12% of the homes in America and are especially needed in outlying rural areas. Fireplaces are also being looked at.
The EPA is attempting to reduce particle pollution with new rules. Instead of limiting fine airborne particulate emissions to 15 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) of air, the change will impose a maximum 12 μg/m3 limit. That is equivalent to a person smoking 3 to 4 cigarettes in a small confined space.
The draconian EPA regulations will be spread out, one will take place in March and the next in five to eight years. Stoves currently in use will not be affected but obviously, getting them repaired will become more and more difficult.
They haven’t yet gone after outdoor appliances or home heating appliances, but can they be far behind? Will people be able to heat their homes in a future controlled by extreme environmentalists? Read more at: independentsentinel.com.
Please click this link: http://po.st/FN5hSh
Very expensive entertainment but one can’t help laughing out loud!
“So wind energy is justified as reducing greenhouse gases that are not causing global warming which does not exist, is receiving millions in subsidies, and wants to kill protected species, an environmental objective. This is hypocrisy on a galactic scale.”
The Executive Order that President Obama signed last Friday is certainly not getting the press coverage it deserves. I know, you almost grow immune to this stuff since it seems to happen every week or so, but this is truly scary stuff. When will America wake up and realize that our electricity and food do not just appear because we want or will it to.
President Barack Obama has given the nation a new “Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience” that expands government bureaucrats’ role in how Americans use their lands, energy, waters and property. Obama announced the executive order Friday, the day after Halloween. The order is titled “Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change.”
Possible Progressive classified advertisement:
Bike lanes needed to increase traffic congestion – Must cost millions.
Recently, the Gainesville (Florida) City Commission voted by a six to one margin to test a plan to narrow segments of NW Eighth Avenue to one lane in each direction for automobiles. The plan would add wide bicycle and pedestrian lanes (also known as sidewalks) in their place.
As printed in the Gainesville Sun: “…there are about 15,180 vehicle trips a day in that area and in the range of 250 bicycle trips, according to a city report.” Anyone who ever had a head cold knows that if the flow slows (congestion), the pressure increases. And I’m willing to bet that there will be a lot of motorists who will be feeling the increased pressure; blood pressure I mean.
By the way, I would like to acknowledge the Gainesville Sun for printing my letter to the editor (below) on this topic:
The “Today’s Topic” question on May 4 was: “Do you support the decision to narrow Northwest Eighth Avenue?” The answer was a resounding no by a margin of 682 to 65.
Less than nine percent of the respondents want Northwest Eighth Avenue narrowed. While not a scientific poll, it makes a strong statement about how out of touch the Gainesville City Commission is with the wants and needs of local residents.
Does anyone have any doubts as to how it will proceed after the “trial period” is over? How is Main Street working out for you?
But keep making your voices heard, there’s hope. As Mahatma Gandhi said: “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.”
Originally posted on: commonsensepost.com
This is a copy of an envelope containing a birthday card that was sent to my grandson earlier this month. Check out the postmark: Those are wind turbines on a wind farm. So, the much
touted hyped wind power that probably couldn’t exist without billions of dollars in federal grants and subsidies, is now being promoted by the United States Postal Service.
Is this what we want the USPS to be doing? Some references below:
The 10 Major Wind Power Companies in the World – Wind Turbine Manufacturers and Companies. Look where GE CEO and former leader of President Obama’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness Jeff Immelt’s company is on on this list.
This clip was uploaded in April, 2011. It’s had almost 323,000 views.
The Progressives at every level of government, whether they are elected officials or bureaucrats, always
think know what’s best for us and think know that they can run our lives better than we can!
Hat tip: ConservativeVideos.com.
I know, the “green energy” bankruptcies are so repetitive the whole thing’s getting boring. But we need to keep up with the extent of the damage and Redstate has published a comprehensive list of the “green energy” companies that have gone bankrupt along with some great analysis.
“Danish wind turbine maker Vestas said the impending expiry of a U.S. tax credit had exacerbated a fall in orders for next year, forcing it to make more than 800 job cuts in the United States and Canada so far this year”
“A123 Systems Inc. (AONE), the electric car battery maker that received a $249 million federal grant, filed for bankruptcy protection after failing to make a debt payment that was due yesterday.
The filing may fuel further political debate over government financing of alternative-energy and transportation businesses. Federal grants and loans to companies including A123, Fisker Automotive Inc. and Tesla Motors Inc. have drawn scrutiny from congressional Republicans following the September 2011 bankruptcy filing of solar-panel maker Solyndra LLC two years after it received a $535 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Energy Department.”
How fast time flies when we are having fun. It has been 20 years since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. And to celebrate, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) is being organized in pursuance of General Assembly Resolution 64/236 (A/RES/64/236), and will take place in Brazil on June 20-22, 2012 to mark the 20th anniversary and the 10th anniversary of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg. I have to give it to them, these folks are resilient. Regardless of the data to the contrary and the Climate Gate data that came out of Great Britain, the UN is still pushing for control and taxing all of us.
Please read this article from the Washington Examiner about the upcoming UN meeting and be prepared to learn more at our Gainesville Tea Party general meeting on Saturday June 23rd when we bring in Agenda 21 expert Victoria Baer.
Americans are paying the hangman for the rope.
It is estimated that since the origin of the global warming hoax in the late 1980s, Americans have seen $50 billion of their dollars thrown down the climate change rat hole.
In a January CNSnews commentary, Elizabeth Harrington noted that “A study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) determined that the United States (has been) funding the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the United Nations’ authority on alleged man-made global warming, with $31.1 million since 2001, nearly half of the panel’s annual budget.”
“In a Nov. 17, 2011 report, ‘International Climate Change Assessments: Federal Agencies Should Improve Reporting and Oversight of U.S. Funding’, the GAO found that the State Department provided $19 million for administrative and other expenses, while the United States Global Change Research Program provided $12.1 million in technical support through the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSP), averaging an annual $3.1 million to the IPCC over 10 years—$31.1 million so far.” Continue reading on canadafreepress.com.